Re: OSPF Authentication and Virtual Links

From: Joel A. Cochran (joelc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 20:00:48 GMT-3


   
   Richard,
       Keep in mind that the virtual link is a logical connection to area
   0. Although you have not put any interfaces on the router with the
   virtual link into area 0, the virtual link is considered an interface
   in area 0.
   
   Easy fix:
       On the router not connected to area 0:
       router ospf xx
       area 0 authentication {message-digest} if using md5.
   
   Set it up just as if you were on area 0... you just dont have the
   interface commands.
   I've tried it, and this works.
   
   Joel Cochran, CCIE# 5448.
   
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Richard Wagner
   
   To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
   
   Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 4:28 PM
   
   Subject: OSPF Authentication and Virtual Links
   
     When configuring OSPF with multiple areas, I tried implementing md5
     authentication in Area0.
     I had the whole mess working without the authentication, and the
     the virtual
     link was working fine.
     When I enable authentication in Area0, the virtual link no longer
     worked.
     I pounded on it for a while and just couldn't make it work. I
     tried a few
     things with no success:
     -applying authentication parameters on the virtual-link statements
     (seemed
     reasonable)
     -applying md5 authentication to all areas and interfaces
     *everywhere* on
     *every* router (shotgun approach)
     (I was hoping that those desparate measures would yield a working
     config
     where I could remove things one-by-one to determine what was really
     necessary)
     The debugs would show (I'm recalling this while at work)...
     "expected type
     2, got type 0 for ospf authentication" or something like that
     (sorry for not
     being exact).
     In the end, I removed all authentication statements and the world
     worked
     again.
     There's a "stunt" here... does anybody know what it is?
     Thanks for your help everybody!
     Richard



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:54 GMT-3