From: Bill Wade (wwade@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 08 2000 - 09:18:45 GMT-3
That's the spirit. And, keep in mind that this lab has gotten progressively mo
re difficult. In fact I met a bunch of guys with numbers in the 1900 to low 20
00 range last week and in those days you could bring notes, books, etc into the
lab.
Good luck,
Bill
At 09:35 PM 2/7/00 , Jim Ervin wrote:
>Okay guys, let's move on. 87 posts regarding one
>command is a bit much. If I seem rude or abrupt,
>please forgive me. I'm going to Halifax Saturday and
>if I don't pass it this time (third try), I'm going to
>get an apartment there and get a job washing dishes.
>I'll then take the lab once a month EVERY month until
>I pass the damn thing.
>
>Jim
>
>
>
>
>--- "Mosley, Arthur" <Arthur.Mosley@wang.com> wrote:
>> no exec-timeout ---it's taught in the ICRC
>> course/in the course material
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Galt Kupec
>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Sent: 2/6/00 12:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Lab shortcuts
>>
>>
>>
>> Brad Hedlund wrote:
>>
>> > 'no exec-timeout' is NOT a valid command ....
>> rather it would be
>> > 'exec-timeout 0 0'
>>
>> True at one time, but I believe it's a valid command
>> on at least
>> some platforms in 12.0 and maybe 11.3. Possibly
>> undocumented though.
>>
>> John
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:53 GMT-3