From: zhencai (zhencai@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 03:59:49 GMT-3
hmmmmm, interesting. But I remembered (if correctly) that a router, by
default, routes ip and bridges everything else unless explicitly configured,
right? So R2 is just a layer 2 bridge, it doesn't know nothing about ipx at
all. Besides, ipx updates was received on R1. Weird?
Thanks.
Zhen Cai
p.s. I'll try your suggestion tomorrow.
-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Aboytes [mailto:earl@linkline.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 10:15 PM
To: zhencai; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: weird bridging problem
Zhen,
I am not sure that you can bridge to a routed interface? Try creating a BVI
at R1 and R3. See if that works.
Earl
At 08:26 PM 2/6/00 -0800, zhencai wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I had this bridging problem, seems pretty easy, but I can't make it work:
> R1----------R2-----------R3--
> s0 s0 e0 e0 e1
>R1:
>ipx routing 0.0.1
>interface serial0
> ipx network 100
>
>R2:
>interface serial0
> bridge-group 1
>interface ethernet0
> bridge-group 1
>bridge 1 protocol ieee
>
>R3:
>ipx routing 0.0.3
>interface ethernet0
> ipx network 100
>interface ethernet1
> ipx network 300
>
>R2 is bridge, "show ipx route" shows that R1 learns R3's ipx 300. But for
>some reason, ping ipx 300 fails, R1 can't even ping its s0. R3 can ping
it's
>e0(ipx 100) and e1(ipx 300). What did I do wrong?
>Thanks a lot.
>
>Zhen Cai
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:53 GMT-3