From: kongck (kongck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 02:08:00 GMT-3
u can use 2 loopback interfaces on r1&r2,for different ring list use different
remote-peer.
remember DLSW just are TCP peers.:)
----- Original Message -----
From: zhencai <zhencai@home.com>
To: Jeff Blum <jblum99@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2000 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: dlsw ring list
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I believe your configuration only allow one side to distinguish between
> rings. I want to allow a particular remote peer to see only one local ring
> AND another local ring goes to another particular remote peer, namely R1's
> ring1 to R2's ring3 and R1's ring2 to R2's ring4.
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Zhen Cai
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Jeff Blum
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 5:31 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: dlsw ring list
>
>
> Just use "dlsw remote 0 tcp 10.3.1.2" (no ring-list
> command). All local rings can then be accessed by the
> remote peer.
>
> If you have multiple local rings and only want to
> allow a particular remote-peer to see 2 of them then
> on your R1 enter:
>
> dlsw remote 1 tcp 10.3.1.2
> dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1 2
>
> Jeff Blum
>
>
> --- zhencai <zhencai@home.com> wrote:
> > Felipe,
> >
> > If you use one local peer with one remote peer, say
> > ring1 with ring3, how
> > can ring2 and ring 4 communicate? Here is the
> > configuration I wanted to put
> > in:
> > R1:
> > source-bridge ring-group 100
> > dlsw local peer 10.3.1.1 (R1's serial0)
> > dlsw remote 1 tcp 10.3.1.2 (R2's serial0)
> > dlsw remote 2 tcp 10.3.1.2 (this command will
> > overwrite the previous line)
> > dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
> > dlsw ring-list 2 rings 2
> > interface tokenring0
> > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > source-bridge 1 1 100
> > source spanning
> > interface tokenring1
> > ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > source-bridge 2 1 100
> > source spanning
> >
> > The router only takes one "dlsw remote" command for
> > the same ip address...
> > Can you provide a configuration?
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Zhen Cai
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: felipe_bucalo@hp.com
> > [mailto:felipe_bucalo@hp.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 10:40 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; zhencai@home.com
> > Cc: felipe_bucalo@hp.com
> > Subject: RE: dlsw ring list
> >
> >
> > Zhen,
> >
> > Once you want only to communicate ring1 with ring3
> > and ring2 with ring4 you
> > just need to have 2 dlsw configuration, one for
> > ring1/ring3 and another for
> > ring2/ring4. You gonna have one local peer with one
> > remote peer in either
> > configuration.
> >
> > Felipe.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: zhencai@home.com [mailto:zhencai@home.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 04 February, 2000 3:04
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Cc: zhencai@home.com
> > Subject: dlsw ring list
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking if this senario will work:
> > ring1 ring3
> > \ /
> > R1-------------R2
> > / \
> > ring2 ring4
> > Allow R1's ring1 to communicate with R2's ring3 and
> > R1's ring2 with R2's
> > ring4, exclusively. The problem I have is on R1(and
> > R2), I can only specify
> > 1 local peer id, while on the other side, I have to
> > use 2 remote ip
> > addresses. Any thoughts?
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> > Zhen Cai
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:52 GMT-3