From: zhencai (zhencai@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 04:51:40 GMT-3
Felipe,
If you use one local peer with one remote peer, say ring1 with ring3, how
can ring2 and ring 4 communicate? Here is the configuration I wanted to put
in:
R1:
source-bridge ring-group 100
dlsw local peer 10.3.1.1 (R1's serial0)
dlsw remote 1 tcp 10.3.1.2 (R2's serial0)
dlsw remote 2 tcp 10.3.1.2 (this command will overwrite the previous line)
dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1
dlsw ring-list 2 rings 2
interface tokenring0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
source-bridge 1 1 100
source spanning
interface tokenring1
ip address 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.0
source-bridge 2 1 100
source spanning
The router only takes one "dlsw remote" command for the same ip address...
Can you provide a configuration?
Thanks a lot.
Zhen Cai
-----Original Message-----
From: felipe_bucalo@hp.com [mailto:felipe_bucalo@hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 10:40 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; zhencai@home.com
Cc: felipe_bucalo@hp.com
Subject: RE: dlsw ring list
Zhen,
Once you want only to communicate ring1 with ring3 and ring2 with ring4 you
just need to have 2 dlsw configuration, one for ring1/ring3 and another for
ring2/ring4. You gonna have one local peer with one remote peer in either
configuration.
Felipe.
-----Original Message-----
From: zhencai@home.com [mailto:zhencai@home.com]
Sent: Friday, 04 February, 2000 3:04
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: zhencai@home.com
Subject: dlsw ring list
Hi,
I'm thinking if this senario will work:
ring1 ring3
\ /
R1-------------R2
/ \
ring2 ring4
Allow R1's ring1 to communicate with R2's ring3 and R1's ring2 with R2's
ring4, exclusively. The problem I have is on R1(and R2), I can only specify
1 local peer id, while on the other side, I have to use 2 remote ip
addresses. Any thoughts?
Thanks a lot.
Zhen Cai
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:52 GMT-3