From: Curtis Phillips (phillipscurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 18:29:14 GMT-3
The other interfaces on the r2 router are not configured as passive.. Why
would you expect that the loopback route would not be propogated from them to
connected routers? Also, since the loopback has a 30 bit mask and the serial
(I assume it's the serial) connection betweeen routers is 30 bits. IGRP will
propogate it.
"Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net> wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------
> Attachment:
> MIME Type: multipart/alternative
> ---------------------------------------------
Hi Everyone,
1st Question:
I have two routers R2 and R3
R2----------R3
R2 has 3 interfaces:
Lo0: 129.45.80.72 /30
E0 : 129.45.80.144 /29
S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30
router igrp 100
net 129.45.0.0
passive-interface lo 0
R3 has 3 interfaces:
S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30
E0 : 129.45.80.48 /30
S1 : 129.45.80.128 /29
router igrp 100
net 129.45.0.0
passive-interface e0
passive-interface s1
On R3, when I "sh ip route", I see R2's loopback in my table. Why? I thought
by "passive-int lo 0", I wouldn't see it?
2nd Question:
If I run OSPF on R3's S1 interface, will I be able to redistribute that into
IGRP since it is a /29 ?
Please explain, it's been a long day and I'm not thinking straight.
Thanks,
Ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3