From: Brad Hedlund (BHedlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 16:56:00 GMT-3
Mike,
You are correct. I misread your example.
My lab exam is next week. If anythings kills me, it will be that I get too
quick with reading the questions and miss something important.
-Brad
>
> if you read my example it uses a ip default network 10.0.0.0.
>
> You are correct, if I used a default network 10.2.1.0 you'd
> get a static
> entered, but I didn't......
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brad Hedlund <BHedlund@LifeTimeFitness.com>
> To: 'Michael Bausenwein' <mikeb55@home.com>; Ben Rife
> <brife@bignet.net>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 1:32 PM
> Subject: RE: IGRP Issues
>
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > In your example 10.2.1.0/24 is not the classful boundry for 10.0.0.0
> > From my experience, this would automatically create a
> static on R2. This
> > would accomplish
> > connectivity, but it would be in violation of a 'no static
> route' rule.
> > The default network command must point to a non-subnetted
> route to prevent
> a
> > static route from being created.
> >
> > -Brad
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Bausenwein [mailto:mikeb55@home.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 12:01 PM
> > To: Ben Rife; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: IGRP Issues
> >
> >
> > the passive interface command just means that it will not
> send out any
> > advertisements out that specific interface. If you want an
> interface to
> not
> > show ip in the routing table you could do a distribute list
> out from R2
> >
> > You can try to redist it, but because the network you wish
> to redist has a
> > smaller subnet mask than the igrp domain, the igrp process
> will not see it
> > as a vald route. Whe using IGRP you can use a default
> network command on
> > R3, and advertise it with igrp. There are a couple of
> gotchas here
> > though. First you must point to a network other than the
> classful network
> > you are running. For example your default network should
> be something
> > other than 129.45.0.0. Also the router that you configure
> it on must be
> > able to reach the network you are setting as a default.
> The network you
> > specify must be on a classful boundry. ie if R3 sees an entry in its
> routing
> > table 10.2.1.0/24, you could use the ip defaul network
> 10.0.0.0 command.
> > The last thing you must do is to advertise the 10.0.0.0 net
> from R3's igrp
> > process with a netwokr 10.0.0.0 command. pages 755 through 758 in
> Routing
> > TCP/IP Vol 1 by Jeff Doyle has an example.
> >
> >
> > Hope this helps......
> >
> >
> > Michael Bausenwein
> > Network Engineer
> > Greenwich Technology Parteners
> > CCNP MCSE CNE
> > email:mbausenwein@greenwichtech.com
> > <mailto:email:mbausenwein@greenwichtech.com>
> >
> >
> > 2 days to go, if newark airport isn't closed due to snow.......
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ben Rife <mailto:brife@bignet.net>
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 11:17 PM
> > Subject: IGRP Issues
> >
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > 1st Question:
> >
> > I have two routers R2 and R3
> >
> > R2----------R3
> >
> > R2 has 3 interfaces:
> > Lo0: 129.45.80.72 /30
> > E0 : 129.45.80.144 /29
> > S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30
> >
> > router igrp 100
> > net 129.45.0.0
> > passive-interface lo 0
> >
> >
> > R3 has 3 interfaces:
> > S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30
> > E0 : 129.45.80.48 /30
> > S1 : 129.45.80.128 /29
> >
> > router igrp 100
> > net 129.45.0.0
> > passive-interface e0
> > passive-interface s1
> >
> > On R3, when I "sh ip route", I see R2's loopback in my table. Why? I
> thought
> > by "passive-int lo 0", I wouldn't see it?
> >
> >
> > 2nd Question:
> >
> > If I run OSPF on R3's S1 interface, will I be able to
> redistribute that
> into
> > IGRP since it is a /29 ?
> >
> > Please explain, it's been a long day and I'm not thinking straight.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3