IGRP Issues

From: Ben Rife (brife@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 01:17:22 GMT-3

Next message: Ben Rife: "IGRP issues."
Previous message: Gary Bradford: "Re: ATM Clip Addressing Question"
Next in thread: jbazar: "RE: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: jbazar: "RE: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Michael Bausenwein: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Ben Rife: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Ronald Salomon: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   Hi Everyone,

   1st Question:

   I have two routers R2 and R3

   R2----------R3

   R2 has 3 interfaces:
   Lo0: 129.45.80.72 /30
   E0 : 129.45.80.144 /29
   S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30

   router igrp 100
   net 129.45.0.0
   passive-interface lo 0


   R3 has 3 interfaces:
   S0 : 129.45.80.4 /30
   E0 : 129.45.80.48 /30
   S1 : 129.45.80.128 /29

   router igrp 100
   net 129.45.0.0
   passive-interface e0
   passive-interface s1

   On R3, when I "sh ip route", I see R2's loopback in my table. Why? I
   thought by "passive-int lo 0", I wouldn't see it?


   2nd Question:

   If I run OSPF on R3's S1 interface, will I be able to redistribute
   that into IGRP since it is a /29 ?

   Please explain, it's been a long day and I'm not thinking straight.

   Thanks,
   Ben

Next message: Ben Rife: "IGRP issues."
Previous message: Gary Bradford: "Re: ATM Clip Addressing Question"
Next in thread: jbazar: "RE: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: jbazar: "RE: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Michael Bausenwein: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Ben Rife: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Maybe reply: Ronald Salomon: "Re: IGRP Issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3