From: Brad Hedlund (BHedlund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 23 2000 - 02:53:13 GMT-3
You dont redistribute/summarize those subnets into FLSM in that situation.
For example, if you took your /22 net and summarized it into /24 for your
FLSM than you would have a problem at the redistribution point from longest
match routing.
The summarized /24 route at the redistribution point points to Null0.
According to longest match routing this would be a better match than your
/22 route. Therefore traffic to that network would get routed to Null0.
In this case you need to have a default route in your FLSM pointing to VLSM.
There is ways to do this without violating the rule of no static routes.....
-Brad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earl Aboytes [mailto:earl@linkline.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 8:07 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: VLSM to FLSM
>
>
> How do you redistribute into an FLSM if the network in the
> VLSM is larger
> than the network in the FLSM?
>
> For example:
> I have a /22 network 10.10.28.0 in area 0 I have addresses
> in it that are
> 10.10.30.1; 10.10.30.2 and 10.10.30.3. and I am trying to
> redistribute this
> into a /24 FLSM.
> Since the network exists as a 10.10.28.0 network in OSPF, how
> do I use the
> summary-address command? The FLSM will not send anything to
> my 10.10.30.1,
> 2 or 3 hosts. Am I missing something? Do I do something else?
> Thanks.
> Earl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3