From: Gary Bradford (glbradford@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 00:38:33 GMT-3
What about Next Hop Self
>From: "Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net>
>Reply-To: "Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net>
>To: "Manjeet Chawla" <mchawla@asanet.com>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: BGP
>Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:58:16 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [208.242.122.8] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBA4FCC160037D82197ABD0F27A0876EF1; Wed Jan 19 19:29:39 2000
>Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3)
>with SMTP id WAA11367;Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:59:00 GMT
>Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:59:00
>+0000
>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>WAA11361GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:59:00 GMT
>Received: from ren.bignet.net (root@ren.bignet.net [204.254.120.13])by
>groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11356GroupStudy Mailer; Wed,
>19 Jan 2000 22:58:58 GMT
>Received: from coolwater (port232.maxt05.bignet.net [207.75.118.232])by
>ren.bignet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA01371;Wed, 19 Jan 2000
>22:00:44 -0500
>From nobody@groupstudy.com Wed Jan 19 19:32:32 2000
>Message-ID: <01ef01bf62f2$3bd9cb40$2deb30cf@datasystems.com>
>References: <018d01bf62e0$b761cea0$2deb30cf@datasystems.com>
><38869CC1.76776331@asanet.com>
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
>Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>You guys were right !
>R2 needed to know how to reach the desired destination. I just threw a
>static on R2 and it worked. However, I know that for the lab, I will have
>to
>redistribute the address into my IGP to get an IGP route. (No statics Rule
>8*)
>
>Good Night Y'all and thanks for the help...
>
>Ben
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Manjeet Chawla" <mchawla@asanet.com>
>To: "Ben Rife" <brife@bignet.net>
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 12:27 AM
>Subject: Re: BGP
>
>
> > I should have included this in my last email. In any case ....
> >
> > If you look at the R2's routing table it "probably" does not have the
> > router to the loopback you are trying to ping. So when R1 sends the
> > packet to R2, R2 doesn't know what to do with it and drops it. Therefore
> > for R2 to know the BGP destinations, you need to either redistribute BGP
> > into R2's IGP or in real life you cannot redistribute the internet
> > routes into your IGP, so you use default route out to the external
> > destinations.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Ben Rife wrote:
> >
> > > Question: How do you configure BGP so I can ping in the following
> > > senario: R1----------R2---------R3-----------R4AS3
> > > AS3 AS4 R2 is not running BGP. I have a loopback on R4, which
> > > is in the BGP and Route tables of R1 & R3. I have a statement on R3
> > > which tells R1, it is the next-hop. R1 can't ping the loopback on R4,
> > > R3 can. What am I missing? Thanks, Ben
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:45 GMT-3