From: Manjeet Chawla (mchawla@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 20:56:53 GMT-3
Any one knows if route aggregation works between NLSP area ?
For example:
Area1 has 1xxx network.
Area 2 has 2xxx networks.
When I default summarize between the area, in addition to aggregate
routes, I still see the explicit route as below
NA 1000 FFFFF000 [19][02/06] via 2024.0007.789d.7630, 2097s,
To0
NA 2000 FFFFF000 via 0.0000.0000.0000,
Nu0
C 2024 (SAP), To0
N 1012 [19][01/01] via 2024.0007.789d.7630, 2097s,
To0
N 1023 [19][01/01] via 2024.0007.789d.7630, 2097s,
To0
N 2000 [19][02/01] via 2024.0007.789d.7630, 2098s,
To0
r4>
config for aggregate router as below!
!
ipx routing 0007.789d.7630
ipx internal-network 2000
!
!
interface Serial0
no ip address
no ip mroute-cache
ipx network 1012
ipx nlsp area1 enable
no fair-queue
clockrate 2000000
!
interface Serial1
no ip address
ipx network 1023
ipx nlsp area1 enable
clockrate 2000000
!
interface TokenRing0
no ip address
ipx network 2024
ipx nlsp area2 enable
ring-speed 16
!
ip classless
!
ipx router nlsp area2
area-address 2000 FFFFF000
route-aggregation
!
!
ipx router nlsp area1
area-address 1000 FFFFF000
route-aggregation
AND THE ROUTING TABLE for the aggregator router:
NA 1000 FFFFF000 via 0.0000.0000.0000, Nu0
L 2000 is the internal network
C 1012 (HDLC), Se0
C 1023 (HDLC), Se1
C 2024 (SAP), To0
NX 555 [19][02/02][01/01] via 2024.0000.3090.66d2, 916s,
To0
NX 666 [19][02/02][01/01] via 2024.0000.3090.66d2, 916s,
To0
NX 999 [19][04/03][03/02] via 2024.0000.3090.66d2, 916s,
To0
N 1000 [27][02/01] via 1000.0000.0000.0001, 4959s,
Se1
N 1300 [27][02/01] via 1300.0000.0000.0001, 4959s,
Se0
r2#
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:44 GMT-3