Re[2]: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP

From: Stanislav Sinyagin (SSinyagin@xxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2000 - 16:42:24 GMT-3


   

that depends on what we're trying to reach -- full connectivity or
150.100.5.0/24 in R3's routing table.

By the way, Darrel, what's needed in initial task ?

Stan

jaime.salazar@equant.com <jaime.salazar@equant.com> wrote:

jsec> My thinking is that if you use ip default-network you do not need a
jsec> summary-address command anymore. What doyou think?

jsec> Jaime

jsec> Brad Hedlund <BHedlund@LifeTimeFitness.com> on 11/01/2000 12:34:58 PM

jsec> Please respond to Brad Hedlund <BHedlund@LifeTimeFitness.com>

jsec> To: Jaime Salazar/Mexico/AMERICAS/Equant@Equant
jsec> cc: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>

jsec> Subject: RE: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP

jsec> Be careful, if you reload it wont work anymore!
jsec> Using Darrel's original scenario, if you 'clear ip ro *' or reload R2 ...
jsec> the summary route goes away and doesnt come back.

jsec> Try it out, see if you can find a solution.

jsec> -Brad

>>
>> Stan,
>>
>> You are right, summary-address command must be used in ASBR
>> rather than area
>> range that is used in ABR. Configure Summary-address in the
>> router with ospf and
>> igrp, additional to this you must type a static route to
>> null0. After you do
>> this you will see it working. I just did it on my own lab and
>> it works just
>> fine.
>>
>> Jaime
>>
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:44 GMT-3