From: Stanislav Sinyagin (SSinyagin@xxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2000 - 16:05:23 GMT-3
the initial requirement was "no statics".
jaime.salazar@equant.com <jaime.salazar@equant.com> wrote:
jsec> Stan,
jsec> You are right, summary-address command must be used in ASBR rather than a
rea
jsec> range that is used in ABR. Configure Summary-address in the router with o
spf and
jsec> igrp, additional to this you must type a static route to null0. After you
do
jsec> this you will see it working. I just did it on my own lab and it works ju
st
jsec> fine.
jsec> Jaime
jsec> "Stanislav Sinyagin" <SSinyagin@mtu.ru> on 11/01/2000 03:52:39 AM
jsec> Please respond to "Stanislav Sinyagin" <SSinyagin@mtu.ru>
jsec> To: "Darrel E. Hinshaw" <dhinshaw@istrength.net>, "CCIE List (E-mail)"
jsec> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
jsec> cc: (bcc: Jaime Salazar/Mexico/AMERICAS/Equant)
jsec> Subject: Re: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP
jsec> Guys, I suspect you're both wrong.
jsec> Read the OSPF commands from CiscoCD:
jsec> "area range" is useful only on ABR routers, to tell the other area
jsec> that my area can be summarized this way. You don't have any ABR,
jsec> so get this command away.
jsec> "summary-address" is used on ASBR only, and it tells the router to
jsec> inject into OSPF aggregared route, instead of many small ones.
jsec> You don't have any problem in redistributing INTO OSPF, so
jsec> get this off too.
jsec> I didn't yet invent the solution, but I'm 100% sure these two commands
jsec> won't ever help (and they don't, as I see in the routing tables 8^)
jsec> Good luck,
jsec> Stan
jsec> ----- Original Message -----
jsec> From: Darrel E. Hinshaw <dhinshaw@istrength.net>
jsec> To: CCIE List (E-mail) <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
jsec> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 18:19
jsec> Subject: RE: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP
>> Everyone,
>>
>> Sorry for responding to this but I have a beef. Could everyone please read
>> and ReRead an e-mail before you decide to reply to it. As you can see from
>> the gentleman's response below (I do Appreciate the response but just wish
>> that it had been appropriate) he provided valid correct information but if
>> he had read my original e-mail he would have seen the summary-address
>> command that he referred to and could have perhaps shed more useful light on
>> the issue.
>>
>>
>> This is not meant to bruise anybody's feeling but rather this should be
>> taken as constructive criticism that will allow this list to become more
>> productive for all of us.
>>
>>
>>
>> ***** RESPONSE ******
>>
>>
>> Summarise all routes to /24 at area boundaries.Since major class is same and
>> mask is same all routes shoud go in to IGRP.U can use summary-address also
>> for this purpose.
>>
>>
>> ***** ORIGINAL *****
>>
>>
>> All:
>>
>>
>> First I'm sorry for making this so long.
>>
>>
>>
>> Great deal of difficulty here. The usual parameter of NO static routes of
>> any kind are in effect.
>>
>>
>> R1-->S0------(OSPF 0)------S0<--R2-->E0------(IGRP)------E0<--R3-->E1
>>
>> Interface Addresses:
>> R1/S0: 150.100.4.5/24 OSPF Area 0
>> R1/L0: 150.100.5.5/30 OSPF Area 0
>> R2/S0: 150.100.4.3/24 OSPF Area 0
>> R2/L0: 150.100.5.9/30 OSPF Area 0
>> R2/E0: 150.100.128.1/24 IGRP
>> R3/E0: 150.100.128.2/24 IGRP
>> R3/E1: 150.100.129.1/24 IGRP
>>
>> Problem: How do I distribute OSPF into IGRP on R2? I have configured but I
>> am unable to get any 150.100.5.x addresses to show up in R3's routing table.
>> Below are the relevant Configs.
>>
>> Router 1:
>>
>> router ospf 5
>> network 150.100.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>> network 150.100.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
>> network 150.100.14.0 0.0.0.255 area 3
>> area 0 authentication message-digest
>> area 3 range 150.100.14.0 255.255.255.0
>> area 3 virtual-link 150.100.3.1
>>
>> Router 2:
>>
>> router ospf 5
>> summary-address 150.100.5.0 255.255.255.0
>> redistribute igrp 5 subnets route-map igrpn2ospf
>> network 150.100.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>> network 150.100.5.9 0.0.0.0 area 0
>> area 0 authentication message-digest
>> area 0 range 150.100.4.0 255.255.255.0
>> area 0 range 150.100.5.0 255.255.255.0
>>
>> router igrp 5
>> redistribute ospf 5 metric 10000 10 255 1 1500 route-map ospfn2igrp
>> passive-interface Loopback0
>> passive-interface Serial0
>> passive-interface Serial0.110
>> network 150.100.0.0
>> network 0.0.0.0
>>
>> ip classless
>>
>> access-list 1 permit 150.100.128.0 0.0.127.255
>> access-list 2 deny 150.100.128.0 0.0.127.255
>> access-list 2 permit any
>> !
>> route-map igrpn2ospf permit 10
>> match ip address 1
>> !
>> route-map ospfn2igrp permit 10
>> match ip address 2
>>
>> Router 3:
>>
>> router igrp 5
>> network 150.100.0.0
>>
>> ip classless
>>
>>
>>
>> ANY help would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Darrel Hinshaw
>>
>>
>>
>> PS If you have actually read this far . . . THANKS.
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:44 GMT-3