RE: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP

From: Brian Best (bbest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2000 - 16:06:56 GMT-3


   
I tried this in the lab just now and was unable to get the routes to come
into IGRP with the summary-address command alone. I needed to add at static
route to null 0 and the route would appear in my IGRP domain.

I am figuring that we are pretty much precluded from using statics in the
lab...

However, I will say that this could be a version issue. My IGRP only router
is running 11.2 - just grasping...

If anyone is interested mail me off the list and I will send my configs.

Regards,

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Hedlund [mailto:BHedlund@LifeTimeFitness.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 10:35 AM
> To: 'jaime.salazar@equant.com'
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: VLSM ---> FLSM or OSPF --> IGRP
>
>
>
> Be careful, if you reload it wont work anymore!
> Using Darrel's original scenario, if you 'clear ip ro *' or
> reload R2 ...
> the summary route goes away and doesnt come back.
>
> Try it out, see if you can find a solution.
>
> -Brad
>
> >
> > Stan,
> >
> > You are right, summary-address command must be used in ASBR
> > rather than area
> > range that is used in ABR. Configure Summary-address in the
> > router with ospf and
> > igrp, additional to this you must type a static route to
> > null0. After you do
> > this you will see it working. I just did it on my own lab and
> > it works just
> > fine.
> >
> > Jaime
> >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:44 GMT-3