From: Joel W. Ekis (jekis@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2000 - 10:36:28 GMT-3
Ken:
Did you see routes that would have passed through the tunnel? Or could you jus
t not ping AT interfaces?
Remember that when you configure an AURP tunnel it has no AT addresses. When a
Cisco router that has an AURP tunnel is asked to ping an AT address on the oth
er side of the tunnel, it has NO address to use as the source. The ping will f
ail!
ethernet ---- r1 ---- AURP ---- r2 ---- RTMP ---- r3 ---- ethernet
r3 can ping the ethernet AT interface of r1. r3 used its interface that links
to r2 as the source.
r1 CANNOT ping the ethernet interface of r3. r1 would have to use the AURP int
erface as the source, but it has no address!
You can see this by turning on debug. You cannot get around this using extende
d AT ping. This command does not let you specify the source interface.
Joel
At 11:14 PM 1/5/2000 -0800, Ken wrote:
>Could not get AURP work.
> any samples would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks
>
>Ken
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:43 GMT-3