From: sono@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Dec 13 1999 - 07:21:59 GMT-3
kongck,
Then what's good about using route reflectors
if a client has to establish peers 'both' with the
RR and the other client, in case of a cluster
consisting of three routers including one RR.
Isn't it a full-mesh ?
I tried this in my lab after my first post.
It looks working well without having a peer
between the two clients.
sono
-----Original Message-----
From: kongck [mailto:kongck@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 8:03 AM
To: sono@softbank.co.jp; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Route Reflectors in Halabi's book
no,both peer will be established,
--- sono@softbank.co.jp wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> One question about BGP route reflectors.
> In Halabi's book on page 424,
> RTD, which is a client of a route reflector RTF,
> has a peer with RTE, which is the other client of
> the same route reflector RTF by the following
> configs:
>
> neighbor 172.16.25.2 remote-as 3
> neighbor 172.16.25.2 next-hop-self
>
>
> In my understanding, a client needs to establish
> a peer only with its route reflector. (Otherwise it
> doesn't
> make sense to use route reflectors.)
> What am I missing?
>
> Regard.
>
> SONO
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:59 GMT-3