From: chuck.skuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Dec 07 1999 - 12:23:47 GMT-3
Try
"redistribute connected" command. This will eliminate the need for the
"network" statement under the routing protocol. There are provisions for
internal and external definitions for the redistribution.
Check the command summary @:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios100/rpcr/66004.htm
rodrigo.kazuo@equant.com on 06-12-99 05:21:55 PM
Please respond to rodrigo.kazuo@equant.com
cc: (bcc: Chuck Skuba/Engineering/GDC/US)
Subject: RE: OSPF redistribution
I
īve just asked because in my sample lab, there is a question: "Create a
loopback interface and REDISTRIBUTE it into OSPF area 4. Ensure that this
network appears in the routing tables of the other routers as internal (OSPF)"
I know if I had configured this network with the network statement under
OSPF process I would have this network as internal in routersīrouting tables. I
was just thinking if we could do it in a different way. Iīve been trying to loo
k
for infos regarding route-maps, etc etc, but I havenīt any other solution yet..
.
Rgds.
"Reed, John" <John.D.Reed@compaq.com> on 12/06/99 05:00:33 PM
To: Rodrigo Kazuo/Brazil/AMERICAS/Equant@Equant
cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OSPF redistribution
What is wrong with using a "network" statement? That would certainly make
these internal. Is that too easy?
JR
-----Original Message-----
From: rodrigo.kazuo@equant.com [mailto:rodrigo.kazuo@equant.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 2:27 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF redistribution
Hi guys... I have a router running OSPF in S0īs network (area 4) and I
want
to redistribute the connected subnets (E0īs and Loopbackīs) into this area.
The
requirement is that these subnets must appear as "internal" to the other
routers
in OSPF... Does anyone have a solution for this?!
Tks in advance...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:58 GMT-3