From: Yogesh Kalley (Yogesh_Kalley@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 12 1999 - 15:29:19 GMT-3
What in the question made u feel that the scenario appered in the CCIE Lab.
Subbiah Kannan <kans@rocketmail.com> on 10/12/99 12:46:23 PM
Please respond to Subbiah Kannan <kans@rocketmail.com>
To: John McCulley <John_McCulley@amrcorp.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc: (bcc: Yogesh Kalley/TheGuardian)
Subject: Re: DLSW Peers
If you guys start discussing CCIE lab questions like
this, then there is no meaning for signing the NDA.
Kannan.
--- John McCulley <John_McCulley@amrcorp.com> wrote:
> I am looking for a way to add a DLSW connection to 2
> different router LANs
> by only adding one Peer.
>
> Here is the network scenario:
>
> Three routers, r1 has a token ring LAN an Ethernet
> LAN and is connected to
> r2 via point-to-point serial link, r2 has an
> Ethernet LAN, and r3 has a token ring LAN and is
> connection to r2 via frame-relay.
>
> tr
> tr
> |
> |
> |
> |
> r1------serial hdlc
> ------r2-----------FR-----------r3
> | |
> | |
> enet enet
>
> I have no problem creating the DLSW connection
> between r1 and r2 so that
> clients on r1's enet and tr can communicate to r2's
> enet. That works fine.
> The question is how do I configure DLSW so that r3's
> tr can communicate
> with r1's enet/tr and r2's enet, by creating ONLY
> ONE new DLSW peer?
>
> The limitation here in the number of DLSW Peers, not
> peer statements!
>
> John
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:52 GMT-3