From: Edward Taggart (etaggart@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Sep 18 1999 - 22:14:21 GMT-3
Thanks John! That did the trick. As you had done, I created a static for
the next hop pointing out the ddr interface and then a default route to the
new static. Excellent.
My setup was as follows:
R1 --- R4 --- R3 --- ddr --- R5 --- R2
1.3 1.4 2.3 2.5 2.2
R3:
decnet propagate static
!
decnet route 2.5 Dialer0 1 50
decnet route default 2.5 1 50
decnet route 2.2 2.5 1 50
R5:
decnet propagate static
!
decnet route default 2.3 1 50
decnet route 2.3 Dialer0 1 50
Thanks! - Ed
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Galt Kupec [mailto:jkupec2@san.rr.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 1999 1:39 PM
> To: Edward Taggart
> Cc: Ccielab@Groupstudy.Com
> Subject: Re: Decnet over DDR
>
>
>
>
> Edward Taggart wrote:
> >
> > I've having difficulty getting decnet static routes to work... I have
> > decnet working correctly over the ddr link, but when I disable
> the routing
> > protocol and try to use a static route, it fails.
> >
> > Has anyone had any luck getting floating statics to work?
>
> Looking back at my notes, I see that I had some problems trying to
> do it the "intuitive" way. At least the way I thought was intuitive.
> Here's how I got it to work:
>
> Say you have R6 and R5 connected via ISDN. (decnet addresses
> given below each router).
>
> R8-----R6-----isdn-----R5-----R7
> 2.8 2.6 2.5 1.7
>
> R5:
> decnet propagate static
> decnet route 2.6 bri0 1 100
> decnet route default 2.6 1 100
>
> and then R7 could dec ping R8 and R8 could dec ping R7.
> (I don't have noted what was configured on R8 though)
>
> --
> John Galt Kupec CCIE #4837
> Chesapeake Computer Consultants, Inc.
> jkupec@ccci.com http://www.ccci.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:51 GMT-3