From: Mark S. Detrick (mark@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Sep 04 1999 - 02:02:48 GMT-3
As a matter of fact, yes, I was using arp server self. The question said
provide arp services it didn't specify how you should do it.
I will give this a try and see how it goes. I just got my ATM lab equipment
this week.
Thanks,
Mark Detrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent Fortunato <Vincent_Fortunato@ins.com>
To: 'Mark S. Detrick' <mark@detrick.com>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: Thoughts from the CCIE Lab in Halifax
> Mark:
>
> If you are using arp-server self, then you are using RFC 1577, which is IP
> only!
>
> You would need to configure for RFC 1483, multiprotocol over ATM and map
> everything to an NSAP (SVC method) or to an atm-vc (PVC method).
>
> I assume you were told a certain method, but were you told to use RFC
1577?
>
> Vince
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark S. Detrick [mailto:mark@detrick.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 12:28 PM
> To: vfortunato@erols.com
> Subject: Re: Thoughts from the CCIE Lab in Halifax
>
> I was using SVC with ARP server as self. The connection was up and IP was
> working.
> Currently, we are in the middle of a move and I don't have anything to
send.
> Maybe next week.
>
> Mark Detrick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Vincent Fortunato <vfortunato@erols.com>
> To: 'Mark S. Detrick' <mark@detrick.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 7:17 AM
> Subject: RE: Thoughts from the CCIE Lab in Halifax
>
>
> > Mark:
> >
> > Not sure where the difficulty lies here. Was your atm2/0 interface
> > connected to anything? If so, was it a pvc configuration, or a lane
> > configuration? If pvc, you would either need appletalk map statements
or
> > invarp. What configs have you attempted so far to help you for your
next
> > attempt?
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mark
> > S. Detrick
> > Sent: Saturday, August 21, 1999 3:51 PM
> > To: Rahmlow, Howard F.; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Thoughts from the CCIE Lab in Halifax
> >
> > One note about ATM...
> >
> > Not sure if you made it to the second day yet. One thing you can be
> > gauranteed, ATM is not a first day only thing. On my test there was a
> > question on getting Appletalk on interface a2/0 (question is not
specific
> to
> > this interface just says all interfaces except x,y,z and a2/0 was not in
> the
> > x,y,z list). I could not even get it to show up as a connected
interface
> > after putting the same commands on that interface as the others. It
> worries
> > me that nobody on this message board has been able to figure it out. I
> > don't know the answer. Other people at work don't know the answer.
> > Remember this is an all or nothing question - if you can't get it going
on
> > this interface you shouldn't bother getting Apple going on any
interface.
> >
> > Needless to say, I didn't make it past the second day.
> >
> > Mark Detrick
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Rahmlow, Howard F. <howard.rahmlow@unisys.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 2:23 PM
> > Subject: Thoughts from the CCIE Lab in Halifax
> >
> >
> > > First let me thank those of you that sent notes of encouragement the
> last
> > > few days. Keep um comming, I'll be back for another shot in December.
> > > Here are a few things I learned form this attempt, and boy did I learn
> > alot.
> > > Read the question, I know I have said this and so have others, thats
> what
> > > killed me. I read the question, and either missed something or read
> > > something into it. As an example, if the question askes for access
> lists.
> > > You better have 2, even if you can do it 1. Also there may or may not
be
> > > notes between questions, or a note in the paperwork you sign before
the
> > > test. Write these down. We were told to, and of cource, I was going to
> > > rember that. I did not, there goes a bunch of points. Also when
checking
> > > your configs. Make sure they do what they are supposed to, but also
> make
> > > sure they are not doing other things. You only have a few routers and
> > > switches to work with and one heck of alot going on. Some times one
> small
> > > change to a routing protocol may look like its working, but also
figure
> > out
> > > what else it may or may not have done to the lab as a whole. And boy
do
> > the
> > > proctors know, and will look for it. More points down the drain.
> > >
> > > I have seen a number of postings in the last few weeks on ATM. For
those
> > of
> > > you that are all worried about new stuff on the labs, clam down. I
think
> I
> > > saw a posting here the other day that mentioned it being worth 5
points
> > > total. That seems really high from what I saw. That version of the
test
> > must
> > > have the highest amount of ATM of any. I would and will spend more
time
> on
> > > the more common stuff. And also look and some of the older stuff that
is
> > not
> > > used any more. I had alot more questions in these areas and alot more
> > > points. Rember the test is on routing and switching. Not hardware
> > > interfaces. If you are going for the test soon and have not read
> Parkhusts
> > > book. Get it and memorize. He points out a number of things that can
> trip
> > > you up, and did.
> > >
> > > Well thats about it, off to the bar.
> > > Howard.
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:50 GMT-3