From: grcitynet (gr@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Aug 23 1999 - 20:33:53 GMT-3
Sorry for the confusion.
I was useing a router with 2 serial ports as the switch so I would not use
subinterfaces, and from the responses I read you could never use
subinterfaces
in the "frame-relay route" command on a frame-relay switch even if you have
a router with one serial port doing switching.
----- Original Message -----
From: Yogesh Kale <ykale@hotmail.com>
To: <jayers@cisco.com>; <vantech@sympatico.ca>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 9:57 AM
Subject: Re:
> Hi
>
> You cant have subinterfaces on FR switch to overcome the shortage of
ports,
> as u need a physical interface to connect to the other side ie CPE.
>
> I think Jim is correct in his explaination and understaning of the
scenario.
>
> Regards... Yogesh
>
>
> >From: Jim Ayers <jayers@cisco.com>
> >Reply-To: Jim Ayers <jayers@cisco.com>
> >To: "Peter Van Oene" <vantech@sympatico.ca>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re:
> >Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:29:22 -0400
> >
> >At 07:49 AM 8/23/1999 -0700, Peter Van Oene wrote:
> > >You guys are missing the point. He's trying to frame switch off
> > >subinterfaces.
> >
> >
> >Sorry, if I missed the point. I assumed that GR had at least 2 serial
> >ports (say s0 and s1) on the fr-switch (ie. the "service provider side").
> >I also assumed the commands in the original email that GR was trying to
> >enter are under the s1 interface and the sub-interfaces in question are
on
> >the "customer premises side."
> >
> >Maybe if GR could clarify his scenario a little.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Ie, he doesn't have a 4 port serial card and the sub interfaces are
> >allowing
> > >multiple dlci's at the switch side. I've never tried this, but
> > >theoretically I see
> > >no reason why it wouldn't work. However, what you can do with it
> > >when its done is pretty limited given you can only cable it to one
other
> > >switch :)
> > >
> > >Peter Van Oene
> > >Senior Systems Engineer
> > >UNIS LUMIN Inc.
> > >www.unislumin.com
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Jim Ayers <jayers@cisco.com>
> > >To: grcitynet <gr@citynet.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Sunday, August 22, 1999 6:15 PM
> > >Subject: Re:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear GR:
> > > >
> > > > Here's a sample config; it works regardless of the interface
> >configured
> > >on the other side of the switch :
> > > >
> > > > FR-SWITCH#sho run
> > > > Building configuration...
> > > >
> > > > Current configuration:
> > > > !
> > > > version 11.2
> > > > no service password-encryption
> > > > no service udp-small-servers
> > > > no service tcp-small-servers
> > > > !
> > > > hostname FR-SWITCH
> > > > !
> > > > !
> > > > no ip domain-lookup
> > > > frame-relay switching
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > clockrate 56000
> > > > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > > > frame-relay route 101 interface Serial1 111
> > > > frame-relay route 102 interface Serial1 112
> > > > frame-relay route 103 interface Serial1 113
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial1
> > > > no ip address
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > clockrate 56000
> > > > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > > > frame-relay route 111 interface Serial0 101
> > > > frame-relay route 112 interface Serial0 102
> > > > frame-relay route 113 interface Serial0 103
> > > > frame-relay route 114 interface Serial2 121
> > > > frame-relay route 115 interface Serial2 122
> > > > frame-relay route 116 interface Serial2 123
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial2
> > > > no ip address
> > > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > > clockrate 56000
> > > > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > > > frame-relay route 121 interface Serial1 114
> > > > frame-relay route 122 interface Serial1 115
> > > > frame-relay route 123 interface Serial1 116
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial3
> > > > no ip address
> > > > shutdown
> > > > !
> > > > interface TokenRing0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > shutdown
> > > > !
> > > > interface BRI0
> > > > no ip address
> > > > shutdown
> > > > !
> > > > no ip classless
> > > > !
> > > > line con 0
> > > > line aux 0
> > > > line vty 0 4
> > > > login
> > > > !
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > FR-SWITCH#
> > > >
> > > > At 07:04 PM 8/22/1999 -0400, grcitynet wrote:
> > > > >When configuring a router to be a frame-relay switch which is the
> >proper
> > >frame-relay
> > > > >route statement. Assuming the router atached to int s0 is using
> > >subinterfaces
> > > > >s0.1 dlci 102 and s0.2 dlci 103.
> > > > >
> > > > >Would it be
> > > > >
> > > > >frame-relay route 201 int s0 102
> > > > >frame-relay route 301 int s0 103
> > > > >
> > > > > OR
> > > > >
> > > > >frame-relay route 201 int s0.1 102
> > > > >frame-relay route 301 int s0.2 103
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3