From: Richardson, Cheryl (cheryl.richardson@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 21 1999 - 20:57:03 GMT-3
Mark,
We currently have some appletalk running over ATM. Sample config
follows..
!
lane database CISCO
name CCIE server-atm-address 47.009181000000001011BA9701.006047D558A9.01
name CCIE server-atm-address 47.00918100000000107BFC1401.0050BD2A6839.01
name CCIE elan-id 1
default-name CCIE
!
ipx routing 0050.bd2e.941c
interface ATM6/0
no ip address
atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
atm pvc 2 0 16 ilmi
atm ilmi-keepalive 2
lane config auto-config-atm-address
lane config database CISCO
lane auto-config-atm-address
!
interface ATM6/0.1 multipoint
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
appletalk cable-range 50520-50524 50523.2
appletalk zone ccie
lane server-bus ethernet CCIE
lane client ethernet CCIE
ipx network AAA
!
router>show apple interface
ATM6/0.1 is up, line protocol is up
AppleTalk cable range is 50520-50524
AppleTalk address is 50523.2, Valid
AppleTalk zone is "ccie"
AppleTalk address gleaning is disabled
AppleTalk route cache is enabled
router>show apple route
C Net 50520-50524 directly connected, ATM6/0.1, zone ccie
router>show apple zone
Name Network(s)
ccie 50520-50524
Cheryl Richardson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark, Detrick [SMTP:mdetrick@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 6:07 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: jkupec@ccci.com
> Subject: Re: Appletalk on an ATM Interface
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Yes, the interface was communicating IP so it must have been up
> physically.
>
> As far as the apple int being up, an apple interface that does not see any
> other apple out on its segment will still come up after a period of time.
> It will time out looking for its node number and consider its number safe
> when it does not hear back from its AARP. It takes longer than bringing
> up
> apple nodes on a segment that already has an active node on it. This is
> my
> experience.
>
> Important to note...
> 1. (most likey) I got this wrong because I didn't know it.
> 2. Its not possible and we were not supposed to setup Apple on this
> interface, eventhough, it was not on the list of don't configure AT on
> these
> interfaces.
>
> Has anybody actually configured AT over ATM?
>
> Mark Detrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Galt Kupec <jkupec2@san.rr.com>
> To: Mark S. Detrick <mark@detrick.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 6:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Appletalk on an ATM Interface
>
>
> >
> >
> > "Mark S. Detrick" wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a 3640 with an ATM interface. I have apple routing turned on
> and
> on
> > > the interface I have apple cable-range 1-1 and apple zone ATM. Then I
> do sh
> > > apple route. I should see the connected interfaces, I see all EXCEPT
> the
> > > ATM interface.
> > >
> > > Why won't AT show up as connected route for an ATM interface? What am
> I
> > > missing?
> >
> > Is your ATM interface connected to anything? Typically, AT won't show a
> > route if the interface hasn't talked with another AT interface on the
> > same network.
> >
> > "show apple int" might report something like:
> >
> > AppleTalk address is 1.94, Invalid
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > --
> > John Galt Kupec CCIE #4837
> > jkupec@ccci.com http://www.ccci.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3