From: David Oakman (doakman@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 21 1999 - 19:16:45 GMT-3
Thats the answer. I was trying to put the summary-address on the loop interface
s not the outgoing ethernet interface. worked like a champ.
thanks
daveo
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Dean [SMTP:Alex.Dean@telecom.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 1999 6:02 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; doakman@home.com
Subject: Re: Rip to Eigrp redistribution/summarazation
David
Where are you doing the show ip route that is not giving you what yuoyu want?
On R1 or R2? You will only see the RIP routes on R1.
To summarise on R2, you should be able to put an ip summary-address eigrp 100 1
0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 on int e0 on R1, so this will be advertised to R2.
Also, as an extra typo I notice you are running eigrp on 192.168.100.0 but you
have no interfaces in this network. I guess you meant 192.168.1.0. Good luck
for next week.
Cheers
Alex
>>> "David Oakman" <doakman@home.com> 22/08/99 06:41:17 >>>
I am having problems summarizing rip generated routes into eigrp.
Redistribution is working fine.
I can't use ip summary address on loopbacks because I am not advertising net 10
with eigrp
I am using auto-summary for eigrp, I don't believe this is working because they
are external routes.
Distribute lists are not working because I am not advertising the networks.
What am I missing Are Route maps the answer and if so what would it look like.
I know it is something stupid, but I can't find any similiar examples
Thanks in advance
ttfn
DaveO
11 days and counting
R1
int loop0
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0
int loop1
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
int e0
ip address 137.20.50.1 255.255.255.0
int e1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
router eigrp 100
redistribute rip metric 10000000 200 255 1 1500
network 137.20.0.0
router rip
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.100.0
R2
int e0
ip address 137.20.50.2 255.255.255.0
router eigrp 100
network 137.20.0.0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3