From: Chad Marsh (chad@xxxxxx)
Date: Sat Aug 21 1999 - 16:53:33 GMT-3
Yes, but the stipulation was to use a single subnet for the frame cloud.
Chad Marsh
Alan Simpkins wrote:
>
> actually point to point subinterfaces work better because adjancencies are
> automatically established on PPP interfaces
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chad Marsh <chad@wa.net>
> To: Peter Van Oene <vantech@sympatico.ca>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 1999 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: OSPF NBMA
>
> > For OSPF, I would think point-to-multipoint would be preferred, so you
> > would not have to worry about OSPF interface priority and DR/BDR
> > elections.
> > Anyone else?
> >
> > Chad Marsh
> >
> >
> > > Peter Van Oene wrote:
> > >
> > > Given a Partial mesh hub and spoke frame network, and having to use
> > > a single subnet for the frame cloud, what would the desired
> > > configuration be?
> > > Assuming OSPF as the routing protocol
> > >
> > > I have had best luck with frame map ip's with the broadcast parameter
> > > and when
> > > using ospf, I have used the ip ospf netword broadcast command.
> > >
> > > Is there a better way to skin this?
> > >
> > >
> > > Peter Van Oene
> > > Senior Systems Engineer
> > > UNIS LUMIN Inc.
> > > www.unislumin.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:47 GMT-3