From: Jason Aarons (jaarons@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 11 1999 - 23:58:05 GMT-3
Next hop must have recursive lookup in the routing table.
Also there is the famous rule of synchronization. Don't advertise what you
don't know about via internal route. You can turn it off via;
router bgp xxx
no sync
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Peter Van Oene" <vantech@sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: "Peter Van Oene" <vantech@sympatico.ca>
Keep in mind that a BGP router will not post routes to the main table for
destinations that it does not know how to reach. I would suggest you look
at your bgp table and view the next hops.. If you do not have routes in the
table to each of the next hops, the bgp router will not post those routes to
the
table.
Peter Van Oene
Senior Systems Engineer
UNIS LUMIN Inc.
www.unislumin.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Regonini
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 12:27 PM
Fellow Groupstudy members,
I could really use some help with my BGP lab. Here is the scenario: I
have a backbone router (R6) that is injecting BGP routes from several
loopback addresses into my lab setup. I have a second router (R1) running
EBGP with this backbone router, and it sees all the routes as it should, and
they show up in the routing table as well. I have several other routers (R2
- R5) running IBGP with the R1 router that see the routes if I do a "sho ip
bgp" all routes are there, however, the routers other than R1 that are
running IBGP don't have the BGP routes in the routing table. Any ideas????
All of the adjacencies are up and running fine, but I don't know why the
routes don't show up int the routing table. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. I can also send configs if necessary, but I did not include
here for the sake of brevity. Thanks again.
Todd Regonini
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3