From: hon-siong chan (honsiong@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 03 1999 - 23:43:50 GMT-3
I need help on my BGP problems encountered in my own practise lab......Below
is the diagram: (Sorry for the length of question!)
R1-------R3--------R2
|
|
|
R4
R1 has 2 loopbacks and 1 serial to R3: int lo0 172.16.4.1/28
int lo1 172.16.6.1/28
int S0 172.16.1.1/24
R2 has 1 loopback & 1 serial to R3: int lo0 172.16.5.1/24
int S0 172.16.2.1/24
R3 has 2 serials to R1/R2 & 1 ethernet to R4: int S0 172.16.1.2/24
int S1 172.16.2.2/24
int e0 172.16.3.1/24
R4 has 1 loopback & 1 ethernet to R3: int lo0 172.16.0.33/27
int e0 172.16.3.2/24
I configured R1,R2 & R3 in BGP AS200, and running OSPF as area 0; while R4
in BGP AS400 only. R3 & R4 are pointing to indirectly connected interfaces;
R3 points to R4's lo0, and R4 points to R3 S0, so I used ebgp-multihop
command & update-source command respectively.I also redistribute BGP AS200
into OSPF area 0.
Q1: When I issued "sh ip bgp neighbor". The state is only Active and no
active TCP connection established.
Only when I point to directly connected interfaces without using
ebgp-multihop & update-souce commands then the link between R3 & R4 is
established???Why?
Q2: I need R2, R3 & R4 to be able to see routes from R1's loopbacks. Do I
need to summarise the 2 loopbacks in R1? What do I need to do?
Any comments are much appreciated....
Regards
HonSiong
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3