From: Bill Carter (bcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 30 1999 - 10:23:21 GMT-3
I thinks no native IPX should pass means that IPX encapsulated in IP should
pass. I remember the early marketing talk about Netware 5. They talked about
the difference between native IP and Novell IP (IPX encap in IP).
Ron Trunk wrote:
> >Hi..
> >
> >How do u interpret the following :
> >
> >No native IPX should pass the link between r3 and r5
> >- I would interpret as no IPX between r3 and r5, we
> >need to create a tunnel.
>
> That's how I would read it.
>
> >
> >No dynamic traffic IPX traffic should be exchanged between R3 and R4
> >- THis one is more obvious. I would interpret as no NLSP, no IPX/EIGRP, no
> >IPX RIP. We can only use static routes.
> >
>
> I'm not sure of your wording, Did you leave out the word 'routing'? This
> might include SAPs too.
>
> If this were a REAL exam question (I'm sure it isn't because that would be a
> NDA violation, right?), the best thing to do if you are not sure of the
> question is to ASK THE PROCTOR. The proctor will help you clarify the
> question. He/She may not tell you the answer in the way you want to hear
> it, but he/she will try and help you nonetheless.
>
> Ron
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:43 GMT-3