From: Ron Trunk (rtrunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 23 1999 - 12:07:03 GMT-3
Pamela,
>What the statement,
> distribute-list 10 out ospf 1
>under the RIP configuration says is, "for all routes being imported into
>RIP from OSPF, filter them according to list 10." If list 10 is denying
>network 12.0.0.0, then network 12.0.0.0 is not coming into RIP from OSPF.
>I promise you, this is the way it works.
>
I think we said the same thing only worded differently.
>Bill, you need to put the distribute-list statement under OSPF instead of
>RIP, and it needs to be,
> distribute-list 10 out rip
>
>What this says is, "for all routes being imported into OSPF from RIP,
>filter according to list 10."
>
>The "distribute-list in <interface>" doesn't work for OSPF at all. This
>form is used ONLY with the distance-vector protocols. You can't filter
>link-state protocols at an interface.
Don't you mean distribute-list OUT <interface> doesn't work for OSPF?
I understand that one, since OSPF advertises from its topology database, not
the routing table.
But why wouldn't IN work? How else would you filter routes coming in from
another domain?
Ron
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:42 GMT-3