From: Ron Trunk (rtrunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 23 1999 - 10:21:12 GMT-3
Bill,
Your statement
distribute-list 10 out ospf 1
under your RIP configuration is incorrect. What this says is "for all
routes learned from OSPF, only redistribute the ones that match list 10." I
don't think that's what you meant.
A better approach would be to put a line under your OSPF config:
distribute-list 10 in ser0.1
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Carter <bcarter@family-net.net>
To: CCIE Lab group <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Friday, July 23, 1999 1:17 AM
Subject: Redist dist-list problems
>I am doing mutual redistribution between RIP and OSPF. OSPF and RIP
>share 150.100.X.X. All interfaces can ping each other. I added a
>12.0.0.0 interface to the RIP domain (no on the Redist router). I want
>to filter the redistribution so the 12.X.X.X network is not advertised
>into the OSPF domain.
>
>After a clear ip route * the ospf routers learn the 12.0.0.0 network
>form ospf. Why??
>router ospf 1
> redistribute rip subnets
> passive-interface Ethernet0
> passive-interface Serial1
> network 150.100.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 (interface s0.1 ospf domain)
>
>router rip
> redistribute ospf 1
> passive-interface Serial0.1
> network 150.100.0.0
> default-information originate
> distribute-list 10 out ospf 1
>
>access-list 10 deny 12.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
>access-list 10 deny 150.100.1.0 0.0.0.255 (serial 0.1 interface to
>OSPF domain)
>access-list 10 permit any
>
>--
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Bill Carter
>
>Favorite Quote
>"bodega stuck again... "
> -Cisco Bug CSCdk37204
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:42 GMT-3