From: Bill Carter (bcarter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 19 1999 - 17:28:22 GMT-3
I have not been there, but everyone says "Only do what you are asked". I would
think that if given a mutual redistribution scenario where routing loops were
possible, you would be specifically instructed to insure loops are not present.
Derek Fage wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> 3 days to go, and I'm still trying different configs on my in-house lab...
>
> Although mutual redistribution does not always need route-maps or
> distribute-lists to prevent routing loops, I've got into the habit of being
> _very_ specific on what I want to redistribute (in the hope that I if other
> changes are made to the configs etc..., that I won't be find a routing loop
> later).
>
> Do you think that the proctors are looking for you to not use route-maps if
> they are not needed, or do they not worry if you're lock down the
> redistribution to exactly what you want ?
>
> Derek...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:42 GMT-3