From: Paul (paulho@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 13:20:44 GMT-3
bill,
1. since 150.100.100.0/24 and 150.100.101.0/24 are connected subnets,
specify "redistribute connected subnets" under router ospf, and
"redistribute connected" under router rip.
2. in your config, rip is already distributing 150.100.100.0 since it's a
flsm and network 150.100.0.0 statement is inclusive, so you don't need the
"redistribute ospf" statement.
3. if you only want 150.100.101.0 distributed under ospf without any other
connected networks, you can simply assign it under ospf by saying:
network 150.100.101.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
4. as for your access expressions, they look correct. if you want to block
routes advertised out of ospf, use:
router ospf 1
distribute-list {acl#} out
for rip, use:
distribute-list {acl#} out serial 0
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Carter <bcarter@family-net.net>
To: CCIE Lab group <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Sunday, July 18, 1999 4:33 AM
Subject: Redistribution
>I need some clarification on distribution list in redistribution.
>
>int s0
>Description Rip_Domain
>ip address 150.100.101.2 /24
>
>int s1
>Description OSPF_Domain
>ip address 150.100.100.2 /24
>
>router rip
>redistribute ospf 1 metric 120
>network 150.100.0.0
>passive-interface s1
>
>router ospf 1
>redistribute rip subnets
>network 150.100.100.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>passive-interface s0
>
>access-list 1 permit 150.100.101.0 0.0.0.255
>access-list 2 permit 150.100.100.0 0.0.0.255
>
>I want to insure that only 150.100.101.0 is redistributed into OSPF from
>RIP, and 150.100.100.0 from RIP into OSPF.
>
>What is the syntax of the distribute-list commands I want. Which
>routing process and in/out?
>
>
>--
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Bill Carter
>
>Favorite Quote
>"bodega stuck again... "
> -Cisco Bug CSCdk37204
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:42 GMT-3