From: Pamela Forsyth (pforsyth@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 12 1999 - 14:43:58 GMT-3
Bill,
I don't see where you have applied the route map in your configuration.
The route map is similar to an access list in that it doesn't have any
effect until you tell the router how to use it. You will need an "ip
policy route-map" statement.
Pamela
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Bill Carter wrote:
> I am trying to set up route maps. Here is the scenario. 2 routers on
> the same ethernet segment (x.x.x.1 and x.x.x.2). Both routers have a
> frame connection to the 3rd router. Ospf is running between all routers
> and the 3 serial port are meshed
>
>
> |---10.10.161.1-RouterB-y.y.y.2---------------------------------
> |
> |
> y.y.y.1-RouterA---------|-a.a.a.1
> |---10.10.161.2-RouterC-y.y.y.3-----------------------------------
> |
>
> I want a packet that is sourced from 10.10.1612 and dest for a.a.a.1 to
> travel from RC to RB to RA
>
>
> Here is the RouterC config
>
> access-list 101 permit ip any 10.10.42.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 101 deny ip any any
>
> route-map sleepy permit 10
> match ip address 101
> set ip next-hop 10.10.161.1
>
> An extended trace from RC ethernet port show the packet next hop is
> y.y.y.1 thu the packet did not got to routerB
>
> Will the route maps over rule the routing protocol?
>
> Is the route map configured correctly?
> !
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Bill Carter
> Senior Network Analyst
> Sentinel Technologies
> http://www.sentinel.com
> pg 800-612-6810
> wk 217-557-5011
> of 217-698-9200
>
> Favorite Quote
> "bodega stuck again... "
> -Cisco Bug CSCdk37204
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:42 GMT-3