From: Ron Trunk (rtrunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 08 1999 - 16:56:29 GMT-3
This is just a guess, but I'm suspicious of the bridge on the hub.
in addition to your bridge-group statement Are you running the IBM ST
protocol or the IEEE? I think you have to run IBM to be compatible with the
SR bridge on the spoke
Ron
10 days...
-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Fage <DerekF@itexjsy.com>
To: 'Ben Rife' <brife@bignet.net>; Derek Fage <DerekF@itexjsy.com>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Thursday, July 08, 1999 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW+
>Ben,
>
>You've got me there !
>
>It looks as if the peers get to the stage where they are exchanging
>capability messages, and there are problems there. You could do a 'show
dlsw
>capabilities' on both routers and compare them.
>
>One other thing I would do is to add 'lf 1500' on the remote-peer
statements
>that point to the router with the ethernet interface to set the largest
>frame size correctly.
>
>Sorry I conldn't be more help, but hopefully somebody may come up with some
>more answers for you.
>
>Good luck in the lab !
>
>Derek...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Rife [SMTP:brife@bignet.net]
>> Sent: 08 July 1999 20:33
>> To: Derek Fage
>> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: DLSW+
>>
>> 5 days left....
>>
>> I tried to ping the peer address from each host, I have connectivity.
>>
>> Here's the "debug dlsw peer" of the peer that won't connect:
>>
>> Dopey#debug dlsw peer
>> DLSw peer debugging is on
>> Dopey#
>> Dopey#
>> DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): event:ADMIN-OPEN CONNECTION
>> state:DI
>> SCONN
>> DLSw: dtp_action_a() attempting to connect peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): state:DISCONN->WAIT_WR
>>
>> DLSw: Async Open Callback 170.100.6.3(2065) -> 11138
>> DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): event:TCP-WR PIPE OPENED
>> state:WAIT_
>> WR
>> DLSw: dtp_action_f() start read open timer for peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): state:WAIT_WR->WAIT_RD
>>
>> DLSw: passive open 170.100.6.3(11131) -> 2065
>> DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): event:TCP-RD PIPE OPENED
>> state:WAIT_
>> RD
>> DLSw: dtp_action_g() read pipe opened for peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: CapExId Msg sent to peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: END-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): state:WAIT_RD->WAIT_CAP
>>
>> DLSw: START-TPFSM (peer 170.100.6.3(2065)): event:SSP-CAP MSG RCVD
>> state:WAIT_CA
>> P
>> DLSw: dtp_action_j() cap msg rcvd from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: Recv CapExId Msg from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: Unknown CV DC with length 6 from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: Unknown CV DD with length 3 from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: Unknown CV DF with length 3 from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>> DLSw: Unknown CV E1 with length 3 from peer 170.100.6.3(2065)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the configs of the two peers:
>>
>>
>> SPOKE
>> source-bridge ring-group 2000
>> dlsw local-peer peer-id 170.100.5.2
>> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 170.100.6.3
>>
>>
>> HUB
>> source-bridge ring-group 2000
>> dlsw local-peer peer-id 170.100.6.3
>> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 170.100.6.1
>> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 170.100.5.2
>> dlsw bridge-group 1
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:41 GMT-3