From: Scott O'Donnell (scotto@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 23 1999 - 23:54:58 GMT-3
In studying Route-map Policy routing, I'd like to confirm something.
Given a Route-Map command that has an associated "match" without a
"set", it seems to me
that in a case like this it doesn't matter is the Route-map command
itself specifies a "permit" or "deny"
because in both case the packet is given to the normal routing engine.
Example:
access-list 120 permit ospf any any
route-map Test permit 10
match ip address 120
route-map Test deny 10
match ip address 120
Don't these two route-map's do the same thing?
I'm trying to think of a way under policy routing where the same
principle wouldn't apply.
Can anyone see one?
Scott
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:39 GMT-3