From: Joe Soricelli (jsoricelli@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 28 1999 - 14:34:27 GMT-3
Can you supply some IP addressing information on the links? Specifically,
the E0 on router 4, the EBGP link, and the 2 area 0 links on router 1?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Mirrotto <mmirrott@stratos.net>
To: 'Joe Soricelli' <jsoricelli@fridge.ccci.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: BGP and OSPF redistribution
>Router 1 has the network statement. Sorry, I should have given more
details.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Soricelli [SMTP:jsoricelli@ccci.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 8:56 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: BGP and OSPF redistribution
>
>Does router 1 or 4 have the network between them listed as a network
>statement under BGP?
>
>-joe
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Mirrotto <mmirrott@stratos.net>
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com' <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Date: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 8:42 AM
>Subject: BGP and OSPF redistribution
>
>
>>I am having problems in my test lab getting BGP routes to redistribute
into
>>my routing tables. Here is the scenario:
>>
>>R1 is running OSPF over a multipoint frame relay connection to R2 and R3.
>>This is OSPF area 0
>>R2 and R3 are also connected via their token ring interfaces in OSPF area
>>1.
>>R1 also has an EBGP connection to R4 over a point-to-point frame relay
>>connection. R4 is advertising the network connected to its ethernet.
>>R1 is mutually redistributing OSPF and BGP. The rest of the OSPF routers
>>see the BGP route from R4, and R4 sees the rest of the OSPF network. The
>>problem is R1 is not propagating the network connecting R1 and R4 (the
EBGP
>>network) even though there is a network statement under the BGP routing
>>process.
>>If I extend the OSPF area 0 to include the network connecting to R4,
>>everything works fine. I guess the bottom line is I need to get this route
>>into the routing tables somehow without using static routes, and without
>>using OSPF. Any ideas?
>>Thanks
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:36 GMT-3