From: Mark Mirrotto (mmirrott@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 28 1999 - 14:28:57 GMT-3
Router 1 has the network statement. Sorry, I should have given more details.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Soricelli [SMTP:jsoricelli@ccci.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 8:56 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP and OSPF redistribution
Does router 1 or 4 have the network between them listed as a network
statement under BGP?
-joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Mirrotto <mmirrott@stratos.net>
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com' <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 8:42 AM
Subject: BGP and OSPF redistribution
>I am having problems in my test lab getting BGP routes to redistribute into
>my routing tables. Here is the scenario:
>
>R1 is running OSPF over a multipoint frame relay connection to R2 and R3.
>This is OSPF area 0
>R2 and R3 are also connected via their token ring interfaces in OSPF area
>1.
>R1 also has an EBGP connection to R4 over a point-to-point frame relay
>connection. R4 is advertising the network connected to its ethernet.
>R1 is mutually redistributing OSPF and BGP. The rest of the OSPF routers
>see the BGP route from R4, and R4 sees the rest of the OSPF network. The
>problem is R1 is not propagating the network connecting R1 and R4 (the EBGP
>network) even though there is a network statement under the BGP routing
>process.
>If I extend the OSPF area 0 to include the network connecting to R4,
>everything works fine. I guess the bottom line is I need to get this route
>into the routing tables somehow without using static routes, and without
>using OSPF. Any ideas?
>Thanks
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:36 GMT-3