From: Cavanaugh, Mike J (CAP, ITS, US) (Mike.Cavanaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 30 1999 - 18:43:14 GMT-3
John,
I would not recommend that you "overengineer" the lab. Provide exactly what
they ask for or you will loose points.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: John Galt Kupec [mailto:jkupec1@san.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 1999 11:04 PM
To: Ben Rife; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VLSM
John Galt Kupec wrote:
>
> > Ben Rife wrote:
> >
>
> > PROBLEM:
> > 25 The numbers represent the reqd' #
> > RouterA of hosts for each network.
> > / \ \ 8
> > / \ \ |
> > RouterB RouterC RouterD --- RouterE
> > 30 10 17 32
> >
> > Address this network given the number of users per network
> > with the 192.200.7.0 address.
>
> I've been taught to start with the network that needs the
> most hosts and work from there. That would be network "E".
>
> You have E with a /27 mask which only gives you 32-2 = 30 hosts.
> That net needs a /26 mask for 64-2 = 62 possible hosts.
And to folow up to my own response...
I wonder if one should "overengineer" the numbers in the
lab? For example, would it be a bad idea to subnet network
B for exactly 30 hosts or make it 62 hosts "for growth"? In
the real world you might. Should you worry about it in the
lab environment? Probably not, I would hope.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:35 GMT-3